#ThrowbackThursday – Larry Crowne

larry_crowne_xlg

Original US release date: July 1, 2011
Production budget: $30,000,000
Worldwide gross: $72,008,245

Back in 2011, Tom Hanks released Larry Crowne, a film that he directed and co-wrote, along with Nia Vardalos.  The marketing mostly centered around the fact that the film co-starred Hanks and Julia Roberts.  It wasn’t their first film together, but it was the first where they both played to type.  Despite that, the box office returns were mediocre and the reviews were even worse.  Hanks and Roberts are two of the biggest, most-beloved movie stars of the last thirty years.  How could something that seemed like such a sure thing go so wrong?  What happened?  Was the film really that bad?

Larry Crowne follows the eponymous Larry Crowne, portrayed by Hanks.  Larry is the typical wholesome good guy that has largely defined Hanks’s career – or at least the public perception of his career.  When Larry is let go from his longtime sales position at a mass-market retailing chain for not having a college education (and therefore possessing the least upside of anyone else at the location), he decides to rectify his situation by finally pursuing a degree.  He enrolls at a local community college and learns more about himself than is dictated by any syllabi, just as he affects the other students and his professors by injecting his infectious optimism into their lives.

gugu-mbatha-raw-y-tom-hanks-en-larry-crowne

The role of Larry Crowne does little to nothing to push Hanks to the boundaries of his talents, but it’s still an endearing part and it’s always nice to see Hanks play this sort of fatherly, uplifting character to supplement the more challenging roles that he has also tackled during his career.  He is surrounded by a stellar supporting cast, led by Julia Roberts.  Roberts plays Larry’s speech professor, Mercy Tainot.  Mercy is cynical and beaten – her enthusiasm for life stamped out by the people around her.  Her students are uninspired and her husband (Bryan Cranston) sits at home all day, looking at PG-13 photos of women in their underwear (the movie’s interpretation of “porn”).

Backing up Hanks and Roberts is a who’s-who of talented actors – many of whom have gone on to become huge names in their own right.  Included in the cast is the aforementioned Cranston, Taraji P. Henson, Cedric the Entertainer, George Takei, Pam Grier, Rami Malek, Gugu Mbatha-Raw (who should be a much bigger star than she is), Wilmer Valderrama, and Hanks’s real-life wife Rita Wilson.  Of this group, contributing the most to the film are Malik and Mbatha-Raw.  As a college professor, myself, I can confirm that Malik’s Steve Dibiasi is the most like a real-life college student.  He provides much of the film’s humor (of which there is quite a bit, and pretty much all of it lands, to some degree) and is supremely likable in spite of Dibiasi’s annoying tendencies and entitled approach to life.  Mbatha-Raw’s Talia is a fellow student who takes an immediate liking to Larry and helps him adapt to modern-day college life.  Talia is an unusually upbeat character for Mbatha-Raw, who typically plays more serious parts.  It’s refreshing to see her smiling and joking and revealing a rarely-seen side of herself, displaying some versatility along the way.  She’s exuberant and adds an element of life and energy to the film that would have been noticeably lacking without her presence.

larry_crowne07

So, what happened?  Why didn’t the film blow the box office away and rack up $200+ million in worldwide box office receipts?  Three things, I believe:

  1. The reviews.  As I mentioned, the reviews were rather critical of the film upon its release.  Or, at least, on first glance.  Upon further inspection, they generally acknowledge that the film has it’s positives, but plays it too safe.  I can’t argue that it’s not safe.  But it’s also so entertaining and charming along the way that it shouldn’t really matter, in my estimation.  I laughed quite a bit, I enjoyed the performances, and I was invested in the characters.  I can deal with safe.
  2. The title.  Honestly, does Larry Crowne stand out as a title in any meaningful way, at all?  Even when I hear the title, myself, I have to ransack my memory in order to recall which movie it was and what it was about.  Unless the character is already a household name, titling a film with just said character’s name is risky.  I have always maintained that John Carter would have performed at least somewhat better at the box office if it had been called John Carter of Mars.  Sometimes, it works out (such as with John Wick), but it’s a gamble.
  3. The marketplace.  This film was released on July 1, right in the middle of blockbuster season.  What was it up against?  A week prior saw the release of Cars 2.  On the same day as Larry Crowne was released, Transformers: Dark of the Moon also hit theaters.  Midnight in Paris and The Town were also still hanging around, pulling in the adult crowds with counterprogramming.  Had the movie opened in the spring or the fall, I think it would have gotten more attention and performed more admirably at the box office.  Even with mostly-underwhelming reviews, people love Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts and want to support them.  But timing matters.

Gugu

So, while Larry Crowne isn’t an exercise in groundbreaking filmmaking, it’s still a fun, delightful time with laughs and wit abound.  It’s sadly been forgotten in the six years since its release, but it’s an appropriate movie to watch when one is in the mood for something light and uplifting.  And it’s a fun game of Spot-the-Future-Star, to boot!  Larry Crowne isn’t an all-time classic, but it deserves better than its reputation – or its lack thereof – suggests.

Like us on Facebook!

Advertisements
#ThrowbackThursday – Larry Crowne

66. Kubo and the Two Strings

kubo_and_the_two_strings_ver13_xlg

This is what I love about the movies.  I get absolutely ecstatic when some little film comes out of left field with virtually no warning and shows the whole world how movie-making is supposed to be done.  It happens every year.  Usually a few times.  Kubo and the Two Strings is one of those instances in 2016.

I went in hopeful.  I could tell the film had potential.  The animation looked great.  The reviews were looking just as good.  And it appeared to be something totally fresh.  But nothing is ever a guarantee until it happens.  And it happened.  Did it ever happen!

I’m going to start with the animation.  I just . . . I just have to.  The film is animated using stop motion, but it’s so smooth and fluid that my brain could hardly comprehend it.  My eyes kept trying to convince me that the film was animated with CGI and said brain was almost convinced.  Only the barely-perceptible frame changes during mouth movement when the characters were speaking kept me firmly rooted in reality, but holy cow!  I’ve never seen such amazing stop motion work.  Never.  Some of the scenes are so absurdly massive in scale and bombastically complex that I have a hard time even understanding how the animation and effects teams pulled it off.  Unbelievable work.  Just unbelievable.

And, on a related note, the art and character design is equally magnificent.  What’s the highest degree of superlative for “beautiful”?  Once you decide, throw it out and create a new word that’s about three degrees higher.  That is how Kubo not only looks but also feels.  I reveled in each new glorious location that the film transported me to and could hardly wait to see the next.  And the Sisters!  Those villainous Sisters are the sleekest, coolest-looking characters I’ve seen in any film in a long, long time.  Whenever they appear, their mere presence commands the viewer’s attention and then their voices (deliciously performed by Rooney Mara) seize it and hold it captive.   I felt myself perk up and smile every single time they arrived because (and I know I’ve used this word, already, but it’s too on-the-nose to use another one) they were just . . . so . . . frickin’ . . . cool!!!

Thankfully, each of the characters are well-written, well-developed, and well-rounded.  They all have decipherable and believable motivations as well as a purpose to serve within the overarching narrative of the film, itself.  The cast is brilliant in their efforts to bring these characters to life and how satisfying it must have felt to them to have made such a wonderful film without ever having to change out of their pajamas!

And though the movie takes place in a fictional world with majestic locales, mystical artifacts, and monstrous creatures, the internal struggles that each character deals with are very real and relatable.  Death, betrayal, and having to make the hard choices between one’s own dignity and the acceptance of family are very deep subjects to mine and Kubo manages to do so with grace and elegance.

And fun!  The action scenes are amazing, both in conception and execution, and each of them feeds into both character and story development.  Kubo is easy to empathize with as our protagonist and Monkey and Beetle fulfill their roles, as well.  But the story is so intricate that I feel like I need to see it again with the benefit of hindsight to make sure I caught all of the clues at the beginning before the backstory and character motivations are fully revealed.

And that sounds perfectly fine to me!  I frankly can’t wait to see Kubo again!  Because of the poor scheduling of my local theater, I had to see it in 2D, tonight.  I need to catch it in 3D when I can.  It’s too gorgeous not to.  That aside, Kubo is everything a film should strive to be.  It’s original and imaginative with deep, complex characters and story, while also featuring jaw-dropping visuals and being exceptionally entertaining.  If I had a concern coming into Kubo, it was that the film wouldn’t be much fun and would take itself too seriously in an effort to be perceived as quote/unquote “artistic”.  Those fears were completely unfounded.  I had a blast watching Kubo and it’s still as artistic a film as we’re likely to see all year!  Plus, for the first time that I can remember, I don’t believe that Disney or Pixar has the best animated film of the year.  But that accolade is quite frankly a restrictive glass ceiling of a compliment for Kubo.  It isn’t just a great animated film; it’s one of the best films of the year, period!  Congratulations to director Travis Knight and studio Laika!

The only question that remains in my mind is whether enough people will see it to elevate it from a sure-fire cult classic to the full-blown worldwide classic that it deserves to be.  Please, please, please support this film!  You say you want something fresh, original, and quality?  Here it is!  So prove that you mean it!  Go see Kubo and the Two Strings!  Like, now!

Follow us on Facebook!

66. Kubo and the Two Strings